March 3, 2013:
Up until last week, in my six years of civil service with the Marine Corps, I had never attended a work-related training, education or professional-development course. They've been offered to me every year, but I was just never interested. A week-long course on conflict resolution in Shepherdstown, WV, sounds like a boondoggle, and when you look at the opportunity cost (a week out of the office, a $4K+ bill for the government, etc.), it just doesn't seem like a lot of value added. For a long time, I'd been hearing a lot of great things from Marine and civilian coworkers about the Institute for Defense and Business's (IDB's) courses, and I thought I'd try one out this year. It was a great decision.
Comments
need usmc guards back in all embassies;fully armed
IN THE VISITS I MADE TO EMBASSIES IN SPAIN AND ENGLAND THERE WERE HIRED LOCAL GUARDS AT BOTH . IN VIEW OF THE ATTACKS RECENTLY I ASK THIS BE DONE AS BEFORE. THOMAS S TUCKER
NEED USMC GUARDS BACK IN ALL EMABSSIES; FULLY ARMED
In the past (the 1800's), there was a good reason for Marines at the Embassies: they were trained professionals who could handle both security and ceremonial duties. The Amabassadors liked having their uniformed escorts and the Marines were authorized deadly force. The security mission has migrated to the State Department Security Forces, who are well trained, well armed, and authorized to provide the appropriate level of force under the guidance of the Ambassador or his staff. Marines are best used doing the things only they can do. Replacing or augmenting State Department personnel with Marines would cost the equivilent of at least a full regiment. That's a regiment we don't have.
Post new comment