Jump to Navigation
Poll

If Marines are to return as ship's company, their role has to radically be defined.

View Results

Comments

need usmc guards back in all embassies;fully armed

IN THE VISITS I MADE TO EMBASSIES IN SPAIN AND ENGLAND THERE WERE HIRED LOCAL GUARDS AT BOTH  .  IN VIEW OF THE ATTACKS RECENTLY I ASK THIS BE DONE AS BEFORE.  THOMAS S TUCKER

NEED USMC GUARDS BACK IN ALL EMABSSIES; FULLY ARMED

In the past (the 1800's), there was a good reason for Marines at the Embassies:  they were trained professionals who could handle both security and ceremonial duties. The Amabassadors liked having their uniformed escorts and the Marines were authorized deadly force.  The security mission has migrated to the State Department Security Forces, who are well trained, well armed, and authorized to provide the appropriate level of force under the guidance of the Ambassador or his staff.  Marines are best used doing the things only they can do.  Replacing or augmenting State Department personnel with Marines would cost the equivilent of at least a full regiment.  That's a regiment we don't have. 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.