Jump to Navigation
Gazette Web Articles
A new annual essay contest supported by the Marine Corps Association and named for LtCol Earl “Pete” Ellis will invite articles that focus on preparing the Marine Corps for future conflict through a wide array of perspectives ranging from doctrine, emerging threats, capabilities, technological advances, and operational concepts.
Sadly, the color of one’s socks has become an indicator of one’s worth as a Marine. He is not judged by his actions in the fight against the Taliban, nor is he judged by the weeks and months of active combat that he has been fortunate enough to survive.
A frequent debate within the pages of this publication concerns the professional development of strategic thinkers—strategic corporals to strategic colonels. Many contributing authors generally agree that waiting until war college matriculation is too late to learn strategic thinking.
This article describes recent changes to The Basic School’s (TBS’) program of instruction (POI), the impetus for those changes, the methodology for evaluation and implementation, and the desired result. Change is a constant in war, and as such, it is a constant in the training and education of officers charged to lead in war.
On 22 March 2011, Marines returned to the shores of Tripoli. While in support of Operation ODYSSEY DAWN, an F–15E fighter went down over Libya, and both Americans ejected. The rescue that followed was not only a textbook example of what the MV–22B Osprey brings to the fight, but also a testament to the agility, flexibility, and effectiveness of our Navy and Marine Corps expeditionary force. Whether ship- or landbased, the MV–22B has become a key enabler of this team.
As a Marine, when I think of resiliency, I think of Marines coming home from combat with the challenges of posttraumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, or amputations. I think about them having the right conditions in their lives so that they can overcome these challenges and get on with their lives, having found that “new normal” as we now call it. . .
Through its first 100 years, Marine aviation has remained committed to its founding principle: supporting Marines in combat. In doing so it has led in the development of close air support (CAS), vertical envelopment, vertical and short takeoff aircraft, electronic warfare, expeditionary airfield operations, air command and control, and tiltrotor aircraft.
In an era in which our national security establishment is being asked to consider draconian cuts as part of the Nation’s reaction to its strained fiscal health, it behooves us to truly understand the unique character of the institutions that make up our armed services. Hopefully, our national leadership will stand back from the dysfunctional political and fiscal morass that exists today and take a long term and strategic perspective about America’s strategic security needs.
The time has come for us to assume an arming posture that puts us in a better position to defend ourselves against the enemy.
The capture of Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the U.S. Marines during the Spanish American War may have had greater impact on the direction of the war, and possibly even on its outcome and the subsequent development of world history, than has been recognized in most historical assessments.