By Edwin N. McClellan and John H. Craige - Originally Published September 1921
Great deeds were done by the American Marines in the World War, and of these every school child knows. Only the historian and the antiquarian know of the part played by the Continental Marines in the Revolution, yet in that desperate struggle in which our forefathers won freedom and the right to exist as a nation, the Marines of that day acted a role fully as important and spectacular as that of the immortal Fourth Brigade in the war with Germany, covering their Corps with undying honor in battles more fruitful in their effect on our history than Belleau Wood and more smashing and decisive in results than the MeuseArgonne.
Few Americans, aside from avowed historians and other searchers of Colonial and Continental documents, know that there were American Marines with Washington at the Battle of Trenton, yet recent investigation of the records of that period disclose that fully a quarter of the entire strength of the heroic band of patriots with whom the First Commander-in-Chief crossed the Delaware on Christmas Eve, 1776, and smote the Hessians in the midst of their revels was made up of Soldiers of the Sea. The archives also show that on that occasion as well as at the equally decisive Battle of Princeton, the Marines conducted themselves in a manner worthy of the high traditions of their Corps and won the warmest praise from Washington himself by their valor, steadiness, discipline and efficiency.
On the roster of officers who led the Marines under Washington are names borne by families distinguished in Colonial annals and woven throughout the history of the United States. Some of these continued in the service of the Corps and won added glory on later occasions. Others transferred to different branches of Washington's forces in need of their services, particularly to the artillery of the Army, where their experience with heavy cannon on shipboard rendered them particularly useful. Others made the supreme sacrifice in the cause of their country on the fieldsof Trenton and Princeton and were buried on the ground that their blood had hallowed.
In dealing with the Battles of the Revolution, writers of popular histories of the United States have paid little attention to the identity of corps or divisions of troops of the regular branches of the service. When the militia of the colonies appeared upon the field, their presence has been noted by writers of their respective states but with the regulars of Washington's forces, little attempt has been made to preserve a record as to the troops which took part in the various battles and skirmishes, except as to the names of general officers and commanders of groups, with the result that the specific achievements of the Marines and of the regiments and other organizations of the Revolutionary Army have been to a great degree lost.
Recent search of the records reveals that of Washington's force of about twenty-four hundred men with whom he crossed the Delaware on that momentous Christmas Eve, 1776, more than six hundred were Marines. These were made up of the "Famous Battalion" of Major Samuel Nicholas, the Marine Guards of the Andrea Doria, Hancock, Montgomery, and other vessels. Coming as they did, as a fresh, well-fed, well-equipped, well-trained reenforcement to Washington's worn-out veterans, exhausted by the constant forced marches and desperate rear-guard actions of their retreat across the Jerseys, they may well have been the factor which supplied the fresh strength and aggressive force which made possible the decisive strategic successes of Trenton and Princeton.
With the coming of December, 1776, the position of Washington's Army was indeed a precarious one, and the cause of the newly born United States trembled in the balance. Worsted in the battles of Long Island and forced to cross the Hudson to New Jersey, Washington was obliged to look on helplessly while the City of New York was occupied by a British Army and Fort Washington and Fort Lee captured. While this was going on a detachment of the main British force overran the surrounding territory, driving a wedge between New England and the more southern colonies, cutting vital avenues of communication.
Furiously pursued by an overwhelming force across the Jerseys, Washington reached the Delaware near Trenton, and rapidly assembled a fleet of boats and barges while the Continental Navy and Pennsylvania State Navy combed the banks of the river fifty miles above and below Trenton, sweeping up everything that would float. On December 8th, Washington's Army completed the passage of the river, taking the most serviceable of the boats with it and destroying those not needed for its own transportation. So effective had been the work of the naval detachments, that when the British reached the river a few days later, not a boat was to be found, and Lord Howe and his commanders quickly decided that it would be impossible to cross until the river should freeze. Accordingly detachments of the British Army occupied Trenton while other details spread up and down the eastern bank of the Delaware pillaging and burning the homes of those colonists loyal to the new government and occupying towns and strong positions.
Meanwhile consternation struck into the hearts of the leaders of the Revolution and it seemed that nothing could save the Americans from complete subjugation. Disheartened by the defeats of their Army and the rapid advances of the British forces, the Continental Congress adjourned from Philadelphia to Baltimore, and adopted a resolution arming Washington with absolute dictatorial powers for a period of six months.
All the able-bodied citizens of Philadelphia were enrolled in the Militia, and the Council of Safety of Pennsylvania organized a Home Guard of all such persons who were not fit to march with the Militia. On December 12, 1776, bounties were offered to all Volunteers enlisting "who shall join General Washington" for six weeks' service, "at this inclement season, to assist in defending their country, threatened with instant invasion."
From New England to Virginia, disheartenment reigned and the affairs of the Thirteen States seemed without hope or promise of success. Among the British, confidence was supremely evident, and Lord Howe and his generals openly boasted that with the coming of colder weather they would cross the frozen Delaware without opposition and occupy Philadelphia, the capital city of the new nation, without striking a blow.
Under these discouraging conditions Washington rallied his shattered Army with desperate energy, sending a call to Philadelphia for all available reenforcements to join him in the most urgent haste. His appeal was immediately answered by the dispatch of approximately 1500 men, nearly half of whom were Marines. These were made up of a battalion numbering about three hundred Marines under command of Major Samuel Nicholas, which had been raised and drilled in Philadelphia to furnish Marine Guards for a number of frigates being built for the Continental Navy. Added to this were other Marine detachments, hastily withdrawn from naval vessels in Philadelphia and operating on the Delaware River, bringing the total up to approximately six hundred Marines.
On account of the pride which Philadelphia, even at that early date, took in its connections with the Marine Corps, these Marines were well-equipped with clothing, arms and ammunition. Practically all of their officers had seen active service against the British on board the vessels of the Continental Navy and for several months they had been occupied in daily drill and frequent skirmishes with small British detachments. As a consequence they had reached an extremely high state of training and discipline and from the numerous successes which had attended their operations, their confidence and morale were excellent.
In addition to the Marines the forces sent to Washington from Philadelphia consisted of several hundred troops of that State, including the famous Philadelphia City Troops and detachments of Bluejackets, used to firing guns under command of Captain Thomas Read of the Navy. The arrival of these reenforcements greatly encouraged Washington and served to raise the morale of his small Army to a great degree. Seeing the scattered and overconfident state of the British forces opposing him, the American Commander-in-Chief resolved to profit by these conditions and strike a blow at the earliest possible moment. He selected the city of Trenton, at that time occupied by a body of about 1200 Hessian mercenaries in the British service under the command of a German, Colonel Rahl, as the point at which his first stroke should be directed. Knowing that it was the custom of these troops to celebrate Christmas with feasting and unrestrained drunkenness, Washington selected Christmas Eve as the night for the blow. On the evening of December 24th, he gathered together a force of about 2400 men with which he crossed the Delaware in open boats through drifting ice, landing at about three o'clock in the morning, several miles above Trenton.
He had originally planned to attack that city in the dark before daybreak Christmas morning, but owing to the difficulties in crossing it was found that he would be unable to reach the city until after daylight. Undaunted, however, he determined to persevere in his attempt, trusting to the overconfidence of the British and the demoralization of the Hessians following their Christmas feast, to make good his surprise. In this hope he was not disappointed. Although the American columns did not reach their positions for the attack until eight o'clock the surprise was complete. Not a shot was fired until the attack was well under way, and the American troops were in the heart of the city almost before the astonished Hessians were aware of their proximity. The success of the attack was assured before a blow was struck. Scarcely any casualties were sustained by the patriots while of the Hessians, Colonel Rahl and about a hundred of his men were killed and the rest surrendered. More than a thousand prisoners were taken by Washington, who retreated with them at once again to the west bank of the Delaware.
Encouraged by his success at Trenton, Washington determined upon a further stroke. Crossing the Delaware again on December 30th, he reoccupied Trenton as a feint. General Cornwallis, who commanded a large British force occupying the town of Princeton, at once responded by marching towards Trenton to give battle. After a skirmish at Assanpink Creek, on January 2, 1777, Washington retreated to the eastward, drawing the British force after him.
Nightfall found him hemmed in by Cornwallis, with the British Army in front and rough country with practically no roads or trails, in his rear. Full of confidence the British commander made his camp, believing that at last he had caught the elusive Colonial chief, and that with the dawn of day, he would be able to scatter or crush his patriot force. Washington had other ideas, however. When night had fallen he gathered his forces, leaving guards to keep his campfires burning through the night, and set out to force his way through the rough country to his rear, around to the Princeton road.
Accustomed to travel, through wild and unbroken country, the Colonials effected this maneuver without loss of time or attracting attention, and at daybreak on the following morning when Cornwallis was preparing to advance against their empty camp, Washington's advance guard appeared on the outskirts of Princeton, more than ten miles distant. Here they found three British regiments, constituting the rear-guard of their army.
Completely surprised, these were beaten in battle in the early morning and retreated with a loss of more than 400 men, leaving quantities of military stores in the hands of the victors. The loss of the American force was extremely small, and after destroying the stores which fell into their hands, Washington continued the march with his Army, and before the British main body around his vacant camp at Assanpink could pursue, he had broken entirely through the British cordon and taken up a strong position at Morristown. Here he was joined by other units of the scattered American forces, and soon found himself at the head of a force sufficiently numerous to give battle to the British on equal terms.
The effect of the news of the successes of Trenton and Princeton on the cause of the Colonies was magical. Congress returned at once from Baltimore to Philadelphia and public rejoicing reigned from New England to Savannah. Through their defeat of the Red-Coats in superior numbers at Princeton the Continentals lost all their awe of the British regulars as fighting men and even the prestige of the dreaded Hessians was shaken. Patriots everywhere renewed their hopes and redoubled their activities, and everywhere militia companies were recruited with new zeal and sent off to join Washington's forces in northern Jersey.
The British were correspondingly discouraged and dispirited. From overrunning southern Jersey and confidently preparing to march on Philadelphia, they were gradually driven back and forced to abandon town after town and concentrate on New Brunswick, where they were constantly harassed and hemmed in until it became a question as to whether they would be able to effect their retreat to the protection of the guns of their fleet at New York without further severe reverses and great loss.
Of the part played by the Marines in these decisive battles of the Revolution, much evidence is scattered through the Continental records, and through the historical archives of Pennsylvania and New Jersey.
Even before the retreat of Washington across New Jersey, the Marines commenced to wage a campaign in connection with the Navy on the Delaware which ended in the complete destruction of British influence in the Delaware valley. It was this campaign which rendered that river an impassible barrier to the British forces, and a safe defense behind which Washington was able to retire to rally his army.
The campaign on the Delaware began in the summer of 1776 following the return of Esek Hopkin's Continental Fleet from its exploit in the Bahamas, where it captured New Providence, together with the British Governor and much military stores. Several vessels of the Continental Navy and the State Navy of Pennsylvania, based on Philadelphia, turned their attention to the work of weeding out, by means of naval expeditions, the British garrisons and groups of armed Tories along the shores of the river, and in parts of New Jersey which could be reached from that waterway and its branches.
Vessels which are named in the Continental records as sending their Marines ashore to take part in these actions are the Montgomery, Flagship of the Pennsylvania State Navy, the Virginia, Hancock and the Andrea Doria, of the Continental Navy, and it is very probable that several others participated from time to time.
In addition to the above named, the following vessels carried Marine Guards : Congress, Franklin, Effingham, Dickinson, Chatham, Burke, Camden, Bull Dog, Experiment and Convention.
A careful count from the muster rolls of the vessels of the Pennsylvania State Navy at this time shows that there were 529 Marines serving on board them. In addition Captain Thomas Forest, in command of 31 Marines, was serving with the Arnold Battery. Captain William Brown commanded the 64 Marines, and his Junior Officer, First Lieutenant James Morrison, on board the Montgomery.
The intimate relations between the Pennsylvania State Marines and the Continental Marines is shown by the fact that during this period two Marines of the Effingham were turned over to Captain Robert Mullan since that Continental Marine Officer claimed to have first enlisted them. In the course of the campaign, which was conducted for the control of the Delaware River, these Marines played a vital part.
By means of their ships' boats, and galleys specially constructed for river warfare, they were able to command the river completely and drive the disloyal forces far inland, burning small forts and capturing garrisons and sweeping up all boats and means of water transportation that might be used against the States.
One of the notable exploits by the Marines during this campaign was the landing at Burlington on December 12, 1776, from the galleys of the Continental Fleet, where they threatened to burn houses in which it was supposed Hessians were concealed. Similar landings were made at other places with similar success, and forces of Marines in boats were constantly at work sweeping the creeks and estuaries between Philadelphia and the rapids above Trenton, keeping detachments of the British forces on the move, and breaking up bands of Tories and pro-British colonists.
When the news came of Washington's defeat on Long Island and his forced retreat across the Jerseys came, the activities of the Marines was redoubled, as it seemed self-evident that it was his intention to retreat beyond the Delaware and make a stand, using that river as a barrier between himself and the British Army. As a result, when Washington reached the Delaware an ample number of boats and barges were at hand for the transportation of his Army, and so complete had been the work of the Marines and the Navy on the river, that his scouts reported that for fifty miles above Trenton and as far below, not a boat remained in disloyal hands.
The value of this work to Washington's harassed army it is not possible to overestimate. Reaching the Delaware in hot pursuit, the victorious British were compelled to come to an abrupt halt. Not a boat could be found for their transportation across the river, and Lord Howe was faced with the alternative of building a bridge, or of waiting for the freezing of the river, either alternative necessitating a delay of weeks or months, affording Washington a vital interval for reorganizing his forces and allowing them to recuperate and repair their shakened morale.
In addition to the British lack of boats, the American Navy held command of the Delaware, rendering operations by the British near the banks of that stream hazardous in the extreme. American Marines still operated in New Jersey in connection with the vessels of the Navy, attacking small parties of the British, cutting off stragglers and dispersing bands of Tories, retiring to the ships when menaced by overwhelming numbers. In these, constant success seems to have attended the Marines, and these unvaried successes relatively unimportant though they were, proved a great factor in raising the morale and inspiring Washington's main army.
It was in this period, between the Battles of Trenton and Princeton, that an exploit was planned with characteristic dash, which promised to rival the most daring feats of the war. Hearing that Elisha Laurence, Sheriff of Monmouth, New Jersey, who had been appointed Lieutenant Colonel by the British, was raising a force of Tories at Monmouth Court House and had imprisoned twenty Americans for refusing to bear arms under the Royal Standard, Major Nicholas of the Marines requested permission of General Cadwalader "of going after Laurence's Party." The incident was of such importance that on December 31, 1776, General Cadwalader wrote to General Washington, asking authority to permit Major Nicholas to start out on his expedition, but the skirmish at Assanpink Creek and the Battle of Princeton intervened to prevent its accomplishment.
On account of their daring and success it was accordingly natural that when Washington appealed for all possible troops prior to his decisive strokes at Trenton and Princeton, the Marines who had proved that they could fight so well ashore should be sent. As a nucleus of these reenforcing Marines, the powerful new Marine battalion recently formed in Philadelphia was selected.
Major Samuel Nicholas commanded this battalion with Captain Isaac Craig as his adjutant. The first company was commanded by Captain Andrew Porter, the second by Captain Robert Mullan, and the third by Captain Robert Deane. Since Captain Craig had taken the Marine Guard of the Andrea Doria ashore, and also acted as Adjutant of Major Nicholas' Battalion, it would appear that his Marines were also attached directly to this battalion.
A payroll of Captain Mullan's company, serving in the battalion of Major Nicholas, signed by Major Nicholas and Lieutenant Montgomery, shows that First Lieutenant David Love, Second Lieutenant Hugh Montgomery, four Sergeants, four Corporals, one drummer, one fifer, and seventy-three other Marines, composed this company. This and other rolls appear in a book containing also minutes of a Masonic Lodge which met at the Tun Tavern on Water Street, Philadelphia, beginning with the year 1749. Robert Mullan, it seems, was a member of the Lodge, proprietor of the tavern and Captain of the Company of Marines, the rolls of which are written in the book. The book was found at "Mill Bank," formerly the residence of Nathan Sellers, in Upper Darby, near Philadelphia, and now the property of his grandson, Coleman Sellers.
In addition to Major Nicholas' Battalion many of the Marine Guards which had participated so successfully in the river campaign were assembled and sent as a part of the reenforcement. It is a matter of known record that the Marine Guards from the Flagship Montgomery, the Hancock, and the Continental warships Virginia and Andrea Doria, were sent, and since there were over five hundred Marines serving on board other naval vessels in the river, it is reasonable to conclude that a considerable number of them also participated in these battles.
There is no doubt but that the arrival of this veteran contingent, well-equipped and with the confidence arising from victories over the British, was a vital element in supplying the stamina and spirit necessary for the achievement of the victories of Trenton and Princeton.
In the Battle of Trenton there were very few casualties on the side of the Americans, and so far as is known, none of these were Marines. In the succeeding frays of Assanpink and Princeton, however, the Marines were not so fortunate.
After the Battles of Trenton and Princeton the Marines accompanied Washington to his winter quarters at Morristown, where, during the reorganization of the Army, a number of them were assigned to the artillery. Major Nicholas' Battalion served as infantry up to February, 1777, and later as artillery. Some acted as convoys for prisoners taken at Trenton and Princeton. For instance, a list dated February 27, 1777, shows that Captain Robert Mullan escorted twenty-five British prisoners of war to Philadelphia. The remainder returned to their ships on the Delaware or to their stations in Philadelphia, and resumed their duties in connection with the Navy.
Much of the material included in this article was published in the magazine of the Daughters of the American Revolution, and is reprinted here by the courtesy of that magazine and its editor, Miss Natalie S. Lincoln.







Comments
Holland M. SmithM
The Marine Corps resented Douglas MacArthur. Post Saipan the Army resented Holland M. Smith, and it was not because he relieved Ralph Smith on Saipan.
First, HM Smith fabricated two stories about the 27th ID in his memoir, "Coral and Brass". Fabrication number 1 was that he had to order soldiers of the 165th Infantry to recover the body of their Colonel, Gardner M. Conroy and give it a Christian burial. Colonel Conroy was killed on day 1 of the invasion of Makin. HM Smith claimed the soldiers of the 165th Infantry allowed the body to remain in the field for three days. The truth is, Col. Conroy's body was recovered and buried the day he was killed. Further HM Smith attended the burial. Professor Harry Gailey cites a number of affidavits in "Howling Mad versus the Army"
Fabrication number 2 was that the 2nd Battalion 105th Infantry allowed a force of 500 Japanese to form up into a column of twos and march throught its position unmolested. There is a map in Carl Hoffman's "Saipan: the Beginning of the End" which shows the Japanese infiltrated around the position of 2/105 Infantry. HM Smith had tasked the 2/105th Infantry to hold a 4 Battalion front and take out a numerically superior Japanese force which was holding a fortified defensive position in Nafutan Point, which explains why 2/105th Infantry could not seal off the entire front.
HM Smith's worst behavior was his reaction to the Gyokusai of 7 July 1944 on Saipan. On 7 July 1944, the Japanese hit the 1st nd 2nd Battalions of the 105th Infantry with the largest, fiercest, most intense suicide attack they ever launched in WWII. HM Smith first claimed it was a few hundred Japanese supported by a couple tanks which attacked those units. Then he said it was 1500 Japanese. Following the attack, MG George Griner, CG of 27th ID had a body count done which found between 4000 and 4500 freshly dead Japanese in the area defended by the 105th Infantry, half of those bodies found in the area defended by the 1st and 2nd Battalions of the 105th Infantry. In spite of terrible casualties to its 1st and 2nd Battalions, 105th Infantry stopped the attack, at least according to an investigation done by Admiral Raymond Spruance shortly after the attack. Another Army regiment, 106th Infantry, counter attacked and drove back the Japanese.
One Marine Unit, an artillery unit, the 3rd Battalion of the 10th Marines, engaged the Japanese. According to "Saipan: the Beginning of the End", 3rd Battalion 10th Marines got off a few shots at the Japanese then abandoned their guns, many of them in firing condition, retreated into perimeters, and fought back infantry style to survive. The 106th Infantry rescued the survivors of 3/10 Marines and recovered their guns for them.
HM Smith's underestimation of the ferocity and size of the attack belies a Marine claim, that HM Smith knew the attack was coming. He didn't have a clue the attack was coming. In the wake of the attack, HM Smith commended 3/10 Marines for their bravery. So far as the Soldiers who actually fought and bled and died stopping the attack, HM Smith called them yellow cowards. Robert Sherrod, a Marine friendly correspondent then crafted the story that the Soldiers broke and the marines of 3/10 marines single handedly stopped the attack.
The Marines, to my knowledge, rather than apologize for HM Smith's behavior, defend his behavior and have tried to promulgate Robert Sherrod's version as real history.
Marines at Trenton
This article provides false information about the Continental Marines and the Battle of Trenton.
No Marines fought at the Battle of Trenton on December 26, 1776. Befoe Trenton, a battalion of Continental Marines, numbering 141 Marines, joined Washington's Army. Washington attached that battalion to Cadwallader's Militia Brigade. Cadwallader was to cross the Delaware south of Trenton, take position along the Assunpink Creek, and prevent the Hessians in Trenton from escaping south. They were also to prevent the Hessian Garrison in Bordentown from interfering in the battle.
Because of icy conditions on the Delaware, on the night of 25 December, 1776, Cadwallader did not cross.
The 2400 troops who won the Battle of Trenton were soldiers, not marines.
As a retired Army officer, I would thank the Marine Corps for not claiming Army accomplishments as their own.
Battle of Trenton
Thank you for correcting the historical record. In "Semper Fi: The Definitive Illustrated History of the U.S. Marines" by Col H. Avery Chenoweth and Col Brooke Nihart, they clearly state that the Marines with Cadwallader did not cross the Delaware to Trenton. However, they were part of Washington's force at the time of th battle. I think the article from 1921 was not as well researched as Chenoweth's and Nihart's book. Clearly the DAR historians are not as accomplished as Marine historians. As a retired Army officer I can understand how sensitive you are to Marines bolstering their record at the expense of the Army. I also apologize for Belleau Wood and the resultant omission of the Army in press dispatches at the battle of Chateau Thierry. And we have forgiven Douglas McArthur for striking the Marines who served in the Phillipines from the roster of units awarded the PUC with the comment, "they got enough glory at Belleau Wood."
Banshee
More about MacArthur
Many Marines who write about the Philippines are disdainful of General MacArthur, e.g. Chuck Lawliss, author of "The Marine Book". What they point out is that General MacArthur remained on Corregidor during the Battle of Bataan and say that is because Corregidor was a safer place than Bataan.
I point out again, during the Battle of Bataan, the 4th Marine Regiment remained on Corregidor. If one accepts what Marines have written about MacArthur, one has to acknowledge that the 4th Marines were in a safer place than the Soldiers on Bataan.
I say again, regardless of any resentment MacArthur may have had with the Marines over Belleau Wood, that situation probably had a lot to do with his reluctance to recommend the 4th Marines for the same award he had recommended the Army units who were fighting on Bataan.
I say again, when MacArthur left the Philippines, Army Units were still fighting the Japanese on Bataan and the 4th Marine were not. That is not disinformation. That is history.
The Philippines
Many Marines are rather dismissive of what the Army did in the Defense of the Philippines in 1941-1942. What they describe Bataan as is the largest surrender of American troops in US Military History, that the Soldiers who fought on Bataan deserve no credit for what they did.
So, it seems to me rather hypocritical on the part of any Marine to say the 4th Marine Regiment deserved a Presidential Unit Citation for what they did in the Philippines. They did not do as much to defend the Philippines as the Soldiers did. I say again, while thousands of Soldiers fought on Bataan, the 4th Marines remained on Coreggidor, not at all in the fight.
The Philippines service
What are your sources of disinformation that you are spreading? Here is an unbaised account. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Battle_of_Corregidor As to who deserved what you where not there ,probably, so you really do not know. So please only speak of what you know and not disparage others.
Anonymous Rebuttal
Clarification
After Bataan fell, a number of people escaped and got to Corregidor. Many were organized into a unit which came under the command of the 4th Marines. Most of those people were soldiers, air corps personnel, Philippine troops who had fought under Army leadership on Bataan.
Again , it is not disinformation but history that the 4th Marines did not defend Bataan.
An interesting statistic about the 4th Marines comes from the web site https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Battle_of_Corregidor:
"By 30 April 1942, the 4th Marines actually numbered 229 officers and 3,770 men, of whom only 1,500 were Marines."
Sources of information
It is not disinformation that the 4th Marine Regiment did not fight on Bataan. Read the account in Marine Colonel Robert D. Heinl's "Soldiers of the Sea". During the Battle of Bataan, the 4th Marine Regiment remained on Corregidor. Corregidor surrendered roughly 4 weeks after the troops on Bataan surrendered. By the time Corregidor surrendered, the Bataan Death March was over.
General MacArthur left the Philippines on !! March 1942. The Soldiers on Bataan were still resisting. MacArthur recommended the Army units for the Presidential Unit Citation. The 4th Marine Regiment was not fighting on Bataan. I say again that probably had something to do with why he did not recommend them for the PUC. Conditions were bad on Coregiddor. They were a lot worse on Bataan.
What is disinformation is that the 4th Marine Regiment fought on Bataan or participated in the Death March.
I say again that a number of Marine Commentators dismiss the Soldiers' stand on Bataan as just a surrender. Yet Marines claim the 4th Marine Regiment should have been commended for what they did in the Philippines. The 4th Marine Regiment did not do as much as the Soldiers in the Philippines. That is history, not disinformation.
4th Marines in the Philippines
The Army Units whom General MacArthur recommended for the Presidential Unit Citation, in spite of being short of every necessity needed for a major battel, did fight a bitter 4 month battle with the Japanese on Bataan. While the Soldiers were fighting on Bataan, the 4th Marine Regiment remained on Coreggidor. That might have had something to do with why General MacArthut was reluctant to recommend them for the same PUC.
4th Marines in the Philippines
You neglect to mention that the Army units, whom General MacArthur recommended for unit awards, had fought a bitter four month battle on Bataan with the Japanese who had invaded the Philippines. The 4th Marine Regiment remained on Coreggidor during the Battle of Bataan. I think that might have had something to do with General MacArthur's reluctance to recommend them for the same award.
Trenton Marine Corps League
Greetings. My name is Gabe Schick, Sgt at Arms of the Marine Corps League - Trenton Detachment 207. I'd like to know if there is copy of this article that I could purchase to permanently attach to our website (http://www.trentonmcl.org/) and use as a historical reference for interested parties. Could someone instruct me on a course of action?
Semper Fi!
Sincerely,
Gabe W. Schick
Archive article
Sgt Schick,
You may link to this article directly using this link: http://www.mca-marines.org/gazette/american-marines-battles-trenton-and-...
I have downloaded a PDF of the original article for your use. Please email me at m.cornelius@mca-marines.org and I will send you the attachment.
Also, if you wish to access our archives in the future, a membership to the Marine Corps Association gives you complete access to all our archives dating back to 1916. Find out more here: http://www.mca-marines.org/magazines-archive
Marine Corps Gazette Web Content Editor
Post new comment